<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Jason Lewis Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net</link>
	<description>America&#039;s Mr. Right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Buffet Rule&#8221; Hypocrisy by Dale Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/2012/05/buffet-rule-hypocrisy/#comment-5555</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/?p=5315#comment-5555</guid>
		<description>@Bill

&quot;I realize that dividend income has already been taxed at the corporate level but I think it would be fair to everybody if it would be taxed as ordinary income.&quot;

you say you realize the income has already been taxed at the corporate rate, but then say its only fair to tax it again at the income level?  You assert that this is  fair, but never give a reason, or show why it is fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill</p>
<p>&#8220;I realize that dividend income has already been taxed at the corporate level but I think it would be fair to everybody if it would be taxed as ordinary income.&#8221;</p>
<p>you say you realize the income has already been taxed at the corporate rate, but then say its only fair to tax it again at the income level?  You assert that this is  fair, but never give a reason, or show why it is fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Buffet Rule&#8221; Hypocrisy by Willis Jenson</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/2012/05/buffet-rule-hypocrisy/#comment-5550</link>
		<dc:creator>Willis Jenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 00:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/?p=5315#comment-5550</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Oracle of Omaha&quot; should more accurately be called Warren &quot;Buffoon&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Oracle of Omaha&#8221; should more accurately be called Warren &#8220;Buffoon&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Buffet Rule&#8221; Hypocrisy by Bill Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/2012/05/buffet-rule-hypocrisy/#comment-5510</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/?p=5315#comment-5510</guid>
		<description>While you mention that tax deferred pension contributions are one of the largest middle class tax breaks, these contributions will eventually be taxed and the dividends and Capitol gains included in these tax deferred accounts will eventually be taxed as normal income. 
I realize that dividend income has already been taxed at the corporate level but I think it would be fair to everybody if it would be taxed as ordinary income. As you mentioned, this the the way a large number of high income people make their money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you mention that tax deferred pension contributions are one of the largest middle class tax breaks, these contributions will eventually be taxed and the dividends and Capitol gains included in these tax deferred accounts will eventually be taxed as normal income.<br />
I realize that dividend income has already been taxed at the corporate level but I think it would be fair to everybody if it would be taxed as ordinary income. As you mentioned, this the the way a large number of high income people make their money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Wrong with the GOP in Nine Short Minutes by DIANE JOHNSON</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/2012/04/whats-wrong-with-the-gop-in-nine-short-minutes/#comment-5405</link>
		<dc:creator>DIANE JOHNSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/?p=5290#comment-5405</guid>
		<description>stand your ground   That sound like a good rally to me.  
I LIKE STAND YOUR GROUND FOR JODY PATZNER 22 YEAR OLD MURDERED IN MINNEAPOLIS.   THANK JASON for defending us by telling the truth.  if you commit the crime you should do the time .  that means if you are white, black, red, or even green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stand your ground   That sound like a good rally to me.<br />
I LIKE STAND YOUR GROUND FOR JODY PATZNER 22 YEAR OLD MURDERED IN MINNEAPOLIS.   THANK JASON for defending us by telling the truth.  if you commit the crime you should do the time .  that means if you are white, black, red, or even green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Wrong with the GOP in Nine Short Minutes by Craig Tyndall</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/2012/04/whats-wrong-with-the-gop-in-nine-short-minutes/#comment-5395</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Tyndall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/?p=5290#comment-5395</guid>
		<description>This is the primary problem with the Republican Party.  I am so frustrated with many of my Republican friends and colleagues because they do not understand what is really going on in Washington or even [insert state capital here].  The vast majority of politicians are are first and foremost for self-preservation, followed closely by dedication to their party.  A distant third are the constituents of their state or district, while those that reside outside of their district bring up the rear.

Jason nailed it.  Until the GOP rediscovers its founding principles and is willing to govern our counties, states, and the nation based on liberty, they will continue to lose at the ballot box and we, the American people, will continue down the road to serfdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the primary problem with the Republican Party.  I am so frustrated with many of my Republican friends and colleagues because they do not understand what is really going on in Washington or even [insert state capital here].  The vast majority of politicians are are first and foremost for self-preservation, followed closely by dedication to their party.  A distant third are the constituents of their state or district, while those that reside outside of their district bring up the rear.</p>
<p>Jason nailed it.  Until the GOP rediscovers its founding principles and is willing to govern our counties, states, and the nation based on liberty, they will continue to lose at the ballot box and we, the American people, will continue down the road to serfdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Of course, Specter&#8230; by john webb</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/2012/04/of-course-specter/#comment-5380</link>
		<dc:creator>john webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/?p=5050#comment-5380</guid>
		<description>GREECE!

I solve my problems and I see the light
We gotta  subsidize, we gotta feed it right
There ain&#039;t no danger we can go too far
We start believing now that we can be like THEY are-
-GREECE is the word!
They think our debt is just a growing pain
Why don&#039;t they understand, It&#039;s just a crying shame
Their lips are lying only spending is real
We’ve got food stamps right now, who cares whose future we steal
-Greece is the word!
Greece is the word, is the word that you heard
It&#039;s free stuff from the fleecing
Greece is the time, is the place ‘cross the ocean
Greece is the way we are feeling
We take their cash and then it&#039;s thrown away
Austere frugality belongs to yesterday
There is a chance that we can make it so far
We start believing now that we can be who they are
-Greece is the word!
Greece is the word, is the word that you heard
It&#039;s got groove it&#039;s got meaning
Greece is the time, is the place is the motion
Greece is the way we’ll be feeling
-This is the Demos’ illusion
Wrapped up in trouble laced with confusion
What we doing here?

We redistribute and we throw away
Conventionality belongs to yesterday
There is a chance that we can make it so far
We mimic Thurson Howell so we can be who we are

-Greece is the word!
Greece is the word, it&#039;s the riot you heard
Because jobs are demeaning
Greece is the time, it&#039;s our debt, like an ocean
Greece is the way we’ll be feeling

Greece is the word, broken glass that you heard
It&#039;s got groove it&#039;s got meaning
Greece is the time, is the place ‘cross the ocean
Greece is you&#039;re future we&#039;re stealing…..

Greece is the word
Is the word
Is the word
Is the word
Is the word
Is the word
Is the word
Is the word
Is the word

LYRICS COPYRIGHT 2012 - JOHN B. WEBB, ECONOMIST OF THE FUTURE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREECE!</p>
<p>I solve my problems and I see the light<br />
We gotta  subsidize, we gotta feed it right<br />
There ain&#8217;t no danger we can go too far<br />
We start believing now that we can be like THEY are-<br />
-GREECE is the word!<br />
They think our debt is just a growing pain<br />
Why don&#8217;t they understand, It&#8217;s just a crying shame<br />
Their lips are lying only spending is real<br />
We’ve got food stamps right now, who cares whose future we steal<br />
-Greece is the word!<br />
Greece is the word, is the word that you heard<br />
It&#8217;s free stuff from the fleecing<br />
Greece is the time, is the place ‘cross the ocean<br />
Greece is the way we are feeling<br />
We take their cash and then it&#8217;s thrown away<br />
Austere frugality belongs to yesterday<br />
There is a chance that we can make it so far<br />
We start believing now that we can be who they are<br />
-Greece is the word!<br />
Greece is the word, is the word that you heard<br />
It&#8217;s got groove it&#8217;s got meaning<br />
Greece is the time, is the place is the motion<br />
Greece is the way we’ll be feeling<br />
-This is the Demos’ illusion<br />
Wrapped up in trouble laced with confusion<br />
What we doing here?</p>
<p>We redistribute and we throw away<br />
Conventionality belongs to yesterday<br />
There is a chance that we can make it so far<br />
We mimic Thurson Howell so we can be who we are</p>
<p>-Greece is the word!<br />
Greece is the word, it&#8217;s the riot you heard<br />
Because jobs are demeaning<br />
Greece is the time, it&#8217;s our debt, like an ocean<br />
Greece is the way we’ll be feeling</p>
<p>Greece is the word, broken glass that you heard<br />
It&#8217;s got groove it&#8217;s got meaning<br />
Greece is the time, is the place ‘cross the ocean<br />
Greece is you&#8217;re future we&#8217;re stealing…..</p>
<p>Greece is the word<br />
Is the word<br />
Is the word<br />
Is the word<br />
Is the word<br />
Is the word<br />
Is the word<br />
Is the word<br />
Is the word</p>
<p>LYRICS COPYRIGHT 2012 &#8211; JOHN B. WEBB, ECONOMIST OF THE FUTURE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Martin v Zimmerman, et al by Richard W. Swigert</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/2012/03/martin-v-zimmerman-et-al/#comment-5365</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W. Swigert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 23:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/?p=4955#comment-5365</guid>
		<description>My question to you Mike is who said he took the law into his own hands?  Maybe it was self defense as he claims.  It sounds to me that you are judging outside of the facts.  ie. Witness statements who saw or heard the encounter and Zimmermans statement to the police.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question to you Mike is who said he took the law into his own hands?  Maybe it was self defense as he claims.  It sounds to me that you are judging outside of the facts.  ie. Witness statements who saw or heard the encounter and Zimmermans statement to the police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Wrong with the GOP in Nine Short Minutes by Kelly Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/2012/04/whats-wrong-with-the-gop-in-nine-short-minutes/#comment-5355</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/?p=5290#comment-5355</guid>
		<description>Confucius said, “If language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant; if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone; if this remains undone, morals and art will deteriorate; if justice goes astray, the people will stand about in helpless confusion. Hence there must be no arbitrariness in what is said. This matters above everything.” (James R. Ware, tanslated 1980).

What&#039;s wrong with the GOP is, in part, that we too often allow the other side not just to mis-use the language but to define it. The first step in solving any problem is... to define it.  If we don&#039;t use correct language in defining problems, we can&#039;t expect the problem to be solved correctly.  Take healthcare for example: if x millions of Americans don&#039;t have insurance, does that mean that x millions of Americans don&#039;t have access to healthcare, or to affordable healthcare?  Absolutely not!  Today, even our politicians and journalists don&#039;t seem to know the difference between health insurance and an HMO.  Policymakers in all 3 branches of government have contributed to the problem by corrupting the language - for example, by forcing HMOs to provide major medical insurance benefits.  If Confucius were alive today, he&#039;d likely tell us to let insurers insure, let HMOs maintain health, let managed care companies manage care.  Then we could have true choice and accountability!

Even Jason Lewis contradicted himself through incorrect language about public goods on his 4/21 show.  Jason said that the purpose of taxes is to raise revenue to provide public goods.  A moment later he said that people should pay according to the government services they consume.  By definition, a public good is not consumed through use, nor can it be withheld from a person who is unwilling to pay.  

However, we don&#039;t all capture the same value from public goods.  In economic terms, income is, in a sense, the value captured from public goods.  That&#039;s not to say government is creating our income.  The fact we can turn to the courts to uphold the obligation of contract, if need be, is one public good without which we might not be able to realize the income we earn.  So a flat income tax rate is the most logical means to raise revenue from people according to the value they receive from such public goods. Without order and the rule of law, we might not be able to hold onto what we&#039;ve earned.  So a flat rate property tax would be another logical way to raise revenue according to the value people receive from the publiic goods.

Despite this slip-up, I appreciate Jason&#039;s efforts to use and spread correct language.  We need more of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confucius said, “If language is not correct, then what is said is not what is meant; if what is said is not what is meant, then what must be done remains undone; if this remains undone, morals and art will deteriorate; if justice goes astray, the people will stand about in helpless confusion. Hence there must be no arbitrariness in what is said. This matters above everything.” (James R. Ware, tanslated 1980).</p>
<p>What&#8217;s wrong with the GOP is, in part, that we too often allow the other side not just to mis-use the language but to define it. The first step in solving any problem is&#8230; to define it.  If we don&#8217;t use correct language in defining problems, we can&#8217;t expect the problem to be solved correctly.  Take healthcare for example: if x millions of Americans don&#8217;t have insurance, does that mean that x millions of Americans don&#8217;t have access to healthcare, or to affordable healthcare?  Absolutely not!  Today, even our politicians and journalists don&#8217;t seem to know the difference between health insurance and an HMO.  Policymakers in all 3 branches of government have contributed to the problem by corrupting the language &#8211; for example, by forcing HMOs to provide major medical insurance benefits.  If Confucius were alive today, he&#8217;d likely tell us to let insurers insure, let HMOs maintain health, let managed care companies manage care.  Then we could have true choice and accountability!</p>
<p>Even Jason Lewis contradicted himself through incorrect language about public goods on his 4/21 show.  Jason said that the purpose of taxes is to raise revenue to provide public goods.  A moment later he said that people should pay according to the government services they consume.  By definition, a public good is not consumed through use, nor can it be withheld from a person who is unwilling to pay.  </p>
<p>However, we don&#8217;t all capture the same value from public goods.  In economic terms, income is, in a sense, the value captured from public goods.  That&#8217;s not to say government is creating our income.  The fact we can turn to the courts to uphold the obligation of contract, if need be, is one public good without which we might not be able to realize the income we earn.  So a flat income tax rate is the most logical means to raise revenue from people according to the value they receive from such public goods. Without order and the rule of law, we might not be able to hold onto what we&#8217;ve earned.  So a flat rate property tax would be another logical way to raise revenue according to the value people receive from the publiic goods.</p>
<p>Despite this slip-up, I appreciate Jason&#8217;s efforts to use and spread correct language.  We need more of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Martin v Zimmerman, et al by MS</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/2012/03/martin-v-zimmerman-et-al/#comment-5350</link>
		<dc:creator>MS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/?p=4955#comment-5350</guid>
		<description>Oops.  That would be &quot;who need to look in the mirror.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.  That would be &#8220;who need to look in the mirror.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Martin v Zimmerman, et al by MS</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/2012/03/martin-v-zimmerman-et-al/#comment-5345</link>
		<dc:creator>MS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonlewisshow.net/?p=4955#comment-5345</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m stunned by the wide spread lack of critical thinking (and listening) in the replies left on this site (totally apart from the horrible grammar and spelling - I wouldn&#039;t expect perfection; but holy cow!).  Have any of you ever heard of Socratic questioning or thinking?  When police requested that Zimmerman stop pursuing Mr. Martin, wasn&#039;t he already out of his car?  He then responded to the police&#039;s request, &quot;OK.&quot;  Currently, there is no publicly available evidence that he continued following Mr. after he made that statement.  Maybe he did, maybe he didn&#039;t.  There is actually more evidence (again, in the public domain) that he didn&#039;t continue following Mr. Martin (i.e., &quot;ok&quot; and his statement to police after the incident) than evidence to the contrary.  I believe there are many among us who to look in the mirror and run an integrity check; stop viewing the incident through the paradigm of your preconceived racial relation notions.  I think Mr. Lewis has this one called just about right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m stunned by the wide spread lack of critical thinking (and listening) in the replies left on this site (totally apart from the horrible grammar and spelling &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t expect perfection; but holy cow!).  Have any of you ever heard of Socratic questioning or thinking?  When police requested that Zimmerman stop pursuing Mr. Martin, wasn&#8217;t he already out of his car?  He then responded to the police&#8217;s request, &#8220;OK.&#8221;  Currently, there is no publicly available evidence that he continued following Mr. after he made that statement.  Maybe he did, maybe he didn&#8217;t.  There is actually more evidence (again, in the public domain) that he didn&#8217;t continue following Mr. Martin (i.e., &#8220;ok&#8221; and his statement to police after the incident) than evidence to the contrary.  I believe there are many among us who to look in the mirror and run an integrity check; stop viewing the incident through the paradigm of your preconceived racial relation notions.  I think Mr. Lewis has this one called just about right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

